![]() ![]() Let’s start by taking a look at what is keeping companies and the FDA for being completely transparent - Trade Secret Information and Confidential Commercial Information. The legal rights of companies to protect “trade secrets” are in conflict with the public’s right to transparency. He told the corporate and food safety leaders at the conference that more than one in four consumers strongly believe small food companies will put their interests ahead of public interest, and more than half of consumers strongly believe that large food companies will put their own interests first.Īre consumers right not to trust food companies? The number of redactions in the FDA’s warning letters would seem to back this perception. Charlie Arnot, CEO of the Center for Food Integrity led a session on “How to communicate with consumers about food safety.”Īrnot explained how questions about food safety have become an issue of trust between companies and consumers. This past March I attended the Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) 2020 conference. We include these “redacted” markers in the warning letter news stories because we think it is important for consumers to see what is being hidden. However, there are often key facts in the warning letters that have been redacted by the FDA. We hope that this is a step toward improving transparency between companies and consumers. The warning letter news stories on Food Safety News are supposed to show the companies violations and remove some of the legal code and technical jargon for our readers. ![]() The recipients are given 15 days to respond to the letters and inform the FDA how they plan to adequately address the violations. They list violations based on findings from FDA inspections. These letters are sent to food companies in the U.S. Every week I pore over the warning letters the Food and Drug Administration has sent to food firms. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |